Connecticut Taxes: Lower Than New York’s for Everyone but the Poor

Back • April 28, 2013 • Uncategorized

One sometimes hears that recent state income tax increases on the rich could cause them to leave Connecticut for New York and points south. Academic research has shown that taxes are simply not a significant factor in families’ moving decisions. Nonetheless, some believe they are, and so it is important for policymakers to understand how much people actually pay in state taxes in Connecticut vs. New York.  A close examination of how much people in different income groups pay in taxes reveals that if taxes are really so pivotal, the rich in New York should be moving to Connecticut, while the poor in Connecticut should be moving to New York.

According to an analysis by the national Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, the effective rates (how much people actually pay) of New York state income taxes are substantially lower for the poorest 40% of taxpayers, while the effective rates of Connecticut income taxes are lower for the richest 1% (5.4% vs. 6.3%). (State earned income tax credits in both states lower the income tax liability for low-income workers to offset the impact of sales and property taxes.)


Effective State Income Tax Rates, Connecticut and New York

Chart (Effective State Income Tax Rates, CT and NY

Factoring in sales, property, and other state and local taxes for a complete picture, the story is similar. Taxes in New York are higher than Connecticut’s for every income group except the poorest 20%, who pay more in state and local taxes in Connecticut than in New York. In Connecticut, the poor pay more while everyone else pays less.


Effective State and Local Tax Rates, Connecticut and New York

Chart (Effective State and Local Tax Rates, CT and NY)

If Connecticut state government conducted this kind of analysis regularly, policymakers could make more informed decisions about the impact of our state and local tax policies on workers in different income groups and businesses of different sizes.  That’s why we’ve called for “tax incidence analyses” that would help policymakers to reform Connecticut’s regressive state and local tax system and develop tax policies based on solid evidence.