The Impact of the Governor’s Proposed Municipal Aid Budget on Education, Towns, and Children

Back • Publication Date: April 9th, 2013

Authors: Kenny Feder

Downloads: Download #1 Download #2 Download #3

This analysis of the Governor’s education and municipal aid proposal finds that two-thirds of the Governor’s proposed increase in Education Cost Sharing (ECS) aid to high-need school districts is funded from cuts to other municipal aid.  Cuts to municipal aid could lead to increased property taxes and the proposed shifts from other municipal aid to education grants could distort local funding for education in ways that have little to do with the educational needs of towns or their capacity to pay for education.

Among the findings:

  • Less than one-third (29%) of the Governor’s proposed ECS state aid increases to Alliance Districts is truly new state money.  The vast majority (80%) of the increase in the Governor’s ECS aid proposal is targeted to Alliance Districts — the thirty school districts that perform most poorly on Connecticut’s standardized tests.  However, most of the increased ECS funds are simply reallocated from other municipal aid grants that the towns were already receiving.

  • Cuts in flexible state aid to cities and towns would increase reliance on local property taxes and could lead to property tax increases.  The Governor’s proposal would eliminate local funding from the state’s Municipal Revenue Sharing Account and the Pequot-Mohegan Fund, cutting flexible state aid for municipalities that can be used for a variety of purposes.  The proposal would also shift nearly all funds from the state-owned PILOT grant into the ECS grant.  If towns spent all of these shifted municipal funds on education, they would lose a total of $223.6 million in flexible state aid.  The Governor would also eliminate property taxes on motor vehicles, which would cost towns an additional $633 million.  To plug the budget holes that would be created by approximately $850 million in lost revenues, towns would likely have to raise property taxes, which would hit low-income residents hardest.

  • The proposed shift of state-owned PILOT grant funds into the ECS grant would distort education funding in ways that have little to do with local educational needs or the capacity of those towns to cover educational costs.  The Governor would shift nearly all funds from the state-owned PILOT grant, which currently can be used for a variety of purposes, into the ECS grant.  PILOT grants compensate towns with state aid for property tax revenues lost due to the presence of state-owned property in these towns.  Shifting existing PILOT funds into ECS means that ECS increases to these towns would reflect the value of state-owned property in that town, rather than the capacity of the town to pay for school costs or what should be allocated through the ECS formula.